As a quick overview,
for-profit education generally refers to institutions in the academe operating
privately in a profit-seeking manner. There are currently many issues and
controversies about these institutions’ operational motives although they have
been thought to increase efficiency (Kozol, 2005). The issue about Kaplan
University’s service to the students will be explored. Does being a for-profit
educational institution really affect the quality and efficiency of learning?
Are there ways to change the slightly damaged reputation of for-profit
educational institutions? These questions show that although there are
advantages and disadvantages in being a for-profit educational institution, the
advantages surpass the disadvantages.
Perhaps the reason why
for-profit educational institutions continue to multiply is because there are a
couple of benefits that could come along with it. Some of these institutions
are even optimized to serve people living in poverty (Alemu, 2010). In some
states and countries, there are over 20 percent of the overall students who are
enrolled in for-profit universities (World Bank, 2003). This could be
considered as a significant ratio between for-profit and public higher
education institutions already.
One of the most formidable
advantages that a for-profit education may offer is its education quality.
Although continuous expansion of these institutions is inevitable, there are
governing bodies in each state that regulates every institution’s standard.
This could have significant
effects in the reputation and quality of education. These two should never be
compromised by provisions for expansion and vice versa (Alemu, 2010). There are
also economic and educational policies that facilitate the current expansions
and quality of education of for-profit educations. Even though for-profit
educational institutions can be considered as a major part of the private
sector, there are still checks and balances operations conducted by the
government to facilitate standardizations.
Also according to Altbach,
Berdahl, & Gumport (2005), “our nation is deeply committed to safeguarding
academic freedom, which is of transcendent value to all of us and not merely to
the teachers concerned. That freedom is therefore a special concern of the
First Amendment, which does not tolerate laws that cast a pall of orthodoxy
over the classroom” (p. 92). So, every
policy and law will definitely have an impact in the US’ goal for a highly
regulated education system.
Kaplan’s edge as a
for-profit educational institution is its use of social media tools and
technology in teaching their students (Blumenstyk, 2009). This could be
considered as a good form of reinforcement for students. The involvement of the
government with these for-profit institutions should however be done in
moderation because excessive government involvement especially in higher
education activities can potentially discourage their standardized functioning
(Mwiria, 2003).
Perhaps the most discouraging thing about for-profit
educational institutions is the fact that they are mainly motivated by monetary
returns. Because of this, the probability that for-profit education
institutions will make their way in rural and slum areas is unlikely. It is
obvious that they cannot get the same amount of money from rural and slum areas
than in urban and elite areas.
Fortunately, despite these
disadvantages, the government authorities still try to encourage the
establishment of these institutions even if the returns for them will not be so
promising at all. Some of the possible interventions that could be done by the
government include the provision of specific assistances like free land and tax
exemptions. One of the most compelling things that Kaplan University failed to
address is their traditional teaching methods that aired negative reputation
ratings among their students.
Yes, they are making use of
advanced technologies and social media as a reinforcement method for teaching
but they are still using some of the oldest principles in teaching. Also, their
implementation of certain policies that are beneficial only for older students
may also have a negative impact on their other students especially the ones who
are still in their freshman year (Blumenstyk, 2009).
In Kaplan University’s case,
there are still possible ways by which they could regain their reputation as an
institution that prioritizes students rather than profit. This could be done by
focusing a larger portion of their attention in things like grants and most importantly,
quality of education. In fact, these two things could prove as the best ways
they could help their students reach success without having to intervene on
their private and personal lives. Another good recommendation for Kaplan
University may be to make their services available to the poor. This would
break the common assumption that private for-profit educational institutions
only serve rich and elite citizens and not the poor (Blumenstyk, 2009).
The proliferation of
for-profit educational institutions is not a negative thing, as this paper
discussed. One may worry about the fact that for-profit educational
institutions can be mainly motivated by monetary returns, in detriment of
quality learning. Nevertheless, the advantages surpass that, as this blog
shows. Further research about this topic suggests that several for-profit
institutions are more capable of providing a higher level of education than
government regulated institutions.
References
Frayter, K. (2011). For-Profit Schools Look Abroad for Growth. CNBC. Accessed October
2011.
Kozol, J. (2005). The
Shame of the Nation. Preparing Minds for Markets and others. Three
Rivers Press.
Alemu, D. (2010). Expansion
vs, Quality: Emerging Issues of For-profit Private Higher
Education Institutions in Ethiopia. International Review of Education. Springer.
World Bank. 2003. Higher
Education Development for Ethiopia: Pursuing the Vision.
Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Mwiria, K. 2003. University Governance and University-State
Relations. In: African Higher
Education: An International Reference Handbook, ed.
by Damtew Teferra and Philip Altbach. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University
Press.
Tooley, J. (2007). Could for-profit
private education benefit the poor? Some a priori
considerations
arising from case study research. UK:
Journal of Education Policy..
Blumenstyk, G. (2009). Kaplan Univerity’s Question: Do Colleges Serve Today’s Students.
The
Chronicle of Higher Education. Accessed October 2011.Retrieved fromhttp://chronicle.com/article/Kaplan-Us-Question-Do/46956/.
Altbach, P.G.,
Berdahl, R.O., &Gumport, P.J. (Eds.). (2005). American higher education in the
Twenty-first
centuries: Social, political, and economic challenges. Baltimore, MD: Johns
Hopkins University Press.
This was a very interesting read, as the tainted reputation of for-profit schools definitely has its inaccuracies, and most audiences do not have the inclination to look deeper into the subject, and often take the issue at face value. However, I was surprised that there was no mention of the fact that so much of our financial aid funds are going into the pockets of these for-profit executives, while us students are left with thousands of dollars of debt. I am sure there is a counter argument for the financial aid issue, and I would be interested in hearing it. Great read!! Thanks for bringing up this issue!
ReplyDeleteThis post claims that for-profits serve low income students, but in many cases they are more expensive and offer less prestigious degrees. These students wind up with a lot of debt, and a hard time finding a job. These colleges need more regulation, and should not have access to government funding.
ReplyDeleteReferences
College, Inc. (http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/collegeinc/view/)
Green Act will allow undocumented students to be able to apply for temporary work permit for a couple of years. However, it leaves one to question if these immigrants are really getting a dream come true, or simply being used by politicians. That is to say, why has this act not been passed long before the upcoming election period? I am glad Green Act has created hope for those who need it. Although, I am still concern with the seemingly unrelated but plentiful unsolved issues with higher education in the US as a collective whole. Also, I feel those issues need to be addressed before a large influx of students attend colleges in the United States. In Addition, I hope undocumented students who qualify become legal immigrants and eventually get their citizenship so they can work in the U.S.
ReplyDeleteI think the for-profit model is being emulated more and more by traditional colleges and universities. In my opinion-all colleges are for profit-hell-they're not "for-loss" institutions. Overall the cost of educations is widening the gap between the "haves" and the "have-nots". Two decades ago, traditional universities scoffed at the idea of online degrees. Now schools as mighty as USC and Harvard boast about their online degree offerings and make no apologies about their intent to expand on this platform. MOOCs/for profit(s) showed us on the "traditional" side-that there are untapped streams of revenue, i.e., poor-black/white/yellow/and red babies who can secure loans to pursue their academic dreams-at schools they most likely wouldn't be admitted to if they applied the traditional route. This in-and-of itself isn't bad, but the proliferation of online courses/degrees from both profit and non profit schools has many in the academy spinning in circles. You can look at the University of Virginia and the debacle created by their rectors (trustees) who ousted the newly installed president (Sullivan) only to reinstate her in a few months time. Their reasoning for ousting President Sullivan was based on the argument that she, "wasn't moving fast enough" to move UVA towards an online platform. This is not good business. I speculate that higher education and student loans will be the next big bubble to burst and put the economy back into a tail-spin. The greater question might be-"should anyone be admitted to college who wants to go?" Also what's the purpose of MOOCs and online degrees? To create a better educated society, or simply to continue to generate revenue for the new religion of the 21 century (Education)?
ReplyDeleteIn response to this blog, I agree that for-profit institutions provide services to students that not-for-profit institutions lack. However, I do not agree that the benefits of for-profit institutions outweigh the costs. One cost is what Vincent mentioned above about the amount of debt that students incur from loans. For-profit institutions received a negative reputation for their practice of pushing students to apply for financial aid while not providing the students with the types of skills required for the degrees they obtained. Another topic discussed in this blog that I found interesting was regarding the need to have less government regulation for for-profit institutions, "government with these for-profit institutions should however be done in moderation because excessive government involvement especially in higher education activities can potentially discourage their standardized functioning." I believe that a balance must exist between government and higher education institutions. However, when higher education institutions evolve into more of a business, then different regulations may apply. If for-profit institutions are viewed as businesses, then their students are considered consumers. Consumers have the right to basic protections which may be enforced through government regulation. For-profit institutions have acted in such a manner that has called for a regulating body to protect their consumers. Also, I believe that higher education institutions function to better lives of students through the services the university provides. Any institution that has a history of exploiting students does not have my confidence to operate without a regulatory body ensuring the future protection of its consumers/students. -
ReplyDeleteGoing along with Jess's response above, I agree that for-profit institutions are viewed negatively, especially by those of us in higher education, but in my experience, the negative judgment is justified. Though I only have limited experience with one type of for-profit institution, the goals and practices of the instution go against the higher education mindset of serving students. The primary focus is always financial gain. The increase of government regulation over for-profit instutions may make it seem as though these instututions are being checked-up on, but I doubt they are being reviewed and regulated as thoroughly as they should be.
ReplyDeleteI agree that it is a good thing that students are now being offered a variety of programs and methods for learning and higher education is adapting (somewhat) to the changing student body. That being said, it does not serve students well if there are multiple for-profit institutions, especially art schools, that are gunning for tuition dollars by offering so many specialized programs. I don't know a lot about Kaplan, specifically, I have experience working for a for-profit arts school. A for-profit school that offers courses (degree or non-degree) in art, photography, dance, acting, etc. is recruiting students heavily but not producing a population of qualified and employable students. Instead we are seeing more students with tremendous debt and little to show for it. I don't think the for-profit model is entirely bad, but I see more harm than good as it stands now.